0.03/0.13	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_11278 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.14	% Command    : vampire --ignore_missing on --mode portfolio/casc [--schedule casc_hol_2020] -p tptp -om szs -t %d %s
0.15/0.35	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.15/0.35	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.35	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.35	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.15/0.35	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.15/0.35	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.15/0.35	% WCLimit    : 180
0.15/0.35	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 12:19:09 EDT 2023
0.15/0.36	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.36	This is a THF_ problem
0.15/0.36	Running vampire_rel_static_ahmed-new-hol_6848 --cores 8 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJsXAFSek9/Vampire---4.8_11278 -m 12000  -t 180
0.21/0.38	% (11497)lrs+10_1:2_cnfonf=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=36:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1799ds/36Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (11499)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:s2agt=32:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=385:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1799ds/385Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (11500)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1799ds/17Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (11501)ott+1010_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:kws=inv_arity:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:sp=const_frequency:i=74:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1799ds/74Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (11502)dis+1004_1:1_cha=on:cs=on:fe=off:hud=1:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1799ds/4Mi)
0.21/0.38	% (11502)Instruction limit reached!
0.21/0.38	% (11502)------------------------------
0.21/0.38	% (11502)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.21/0.38	% (11502)Termination reason: Unknown
0.21/0.38	% (11502)Termination phase: Saturation
0.21/0.38	
0.21/0.38	% (11502)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.21/0.38	% (11502)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
0.21/0.38	% (11502)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.21/0.38	% (11502)------------------------------
0.21/0.38	% (11502)------------------------------
0.21/0.38	% (11497)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.21/0.38	% (11497)------------------------------
0.21/0.38	% (11497)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.21/0.38	% (11497)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.21/0.38	
0.21/0.38	
0.21/0.38	% (11497)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.21/0.38	% (11497)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
0.21/0.38	% (11497)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
0.21/0.38	% (11497)------------------------------
0.21/0.38	% (11497)------------------------------
0.21/0.38	% (11499)First to succeed.
0.21/0.39	% (11498)lrs+1002_1:128_au=on:c=on:fsr=off:piset=equals:i=34:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1799ds/34Mi)
0.21/0.39	% (11503)lrs+1002_1:14_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:sac=on:sos=on:i=915:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (1799ds/915Mi)
0.21/0.39	% (11500)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
0.21/0.39	% (11499)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.21/0.39	% SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
0.21/0.39	% SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_0, type, in: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_2, type, is_a: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_3, type, emptyset: $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_4, type, unord_pair: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_5, type, singleton: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_6, type, union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_7, type, excl_union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_8, type, intersection: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_9, type, setminus: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_10, type, complement: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_11, type, disjoint: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_12, type, subset: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_13, type, meets: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_14, type, misses: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_28, type, sK0: $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_29, type, sK1: $i > $o).
0.21/0.39	thf(func_def_31, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
0.21/0.39	thf(f148,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  $false),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f75,f76,f103,f127,f136,f139,f147])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f147,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ~spl2_1 | spl2_5 | ~spl2_6),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f146])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f146,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  $false | (~spl2_1 | spl2_5 | ~spl2_6)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f142,f130])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f130,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((sK0 @ sK5) != $false) | spl2_5),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f129])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f129,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  spl2_5 <=> ((sK0 @ sK5) = $false)),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_5])])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f142,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((sK0 @ sK5) = $false) | (~spl2_1 | ~spl2_6)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f140])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f140,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((sK0 @ sK5) = $false) | ($true = $false) | (~spl2_1 | ~spl2_6)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(superposition,[],[f135,f106])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f106,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((sK1 @ X1) = $false) | ((sK0 @ X1) = $false)) ) | ~spl2_1),
0.21/0.39	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f105])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f105,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((sK0 @ X1) & (sK1 @ X1)) = $false)) ) | ~spl2_1),
0.21/0.39	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f104])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f104,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : ((((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) @ X1) = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ($false)) @ X1))) ) | ~spl2_1),
0.21/0.39	  inference(argument_congruence,[],[f69])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f69,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) = (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false))) | ~spl2_1),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f68])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f68,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  spl2_1 <=> ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) = (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false)))),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f135,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((sK1 @ sK5) = $true) | ~spl2_6),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f133])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f133,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  spl2_6 <=> ((sK1 @ sK5) = $true)),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_6])])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f139,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ~spl2_4 | ~spl2_5),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f138])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f138,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  $false | (~spl2_4 | ~spl2_5)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f137])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f137,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ($true = $false) | (~spl2_4 | ~spl2_5)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f125,f131])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f131,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((sK0 @ sK5) = $false) | ~spl2_5),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f129])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f125,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ($true = (sK0 @ sK5)) | ~spl2_4),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f123])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f123,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  spl2_4 <=> ($true = (sK0 @ sK5))),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_4])])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f136,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  spl2_5 | spl2_6 | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f113,f72,f133,f129])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f72,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  spl2_2 <=> (sK0 = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (~ (sK1 @ Y0)))))),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f113,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((sK1 @ sK5) = $true) | ((sK0 @ sK5) = $false) | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f112])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f112,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ($false = (~ (sK1 @ sK5))) | ((sK0 @ sK5) = $false) | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f111])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f111,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((sK0 @ sK5) = $false) | ($false = (~ (sK1 @ sK5))) | ((sK0 @ sK5) = $false) | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f110])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f110,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((sK0 @ sK5) = $false) | ($false = ((sK0 @ sK5) & (~ (sK1 @ sK5)))) | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f108])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f108,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((sK0 @ sK5) != ((sK0 @ sK5) & (~ (sK1 @ sK5)))) | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f107])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f107,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (~ (sK1 @ Y0)))) @ sK5) != (sK0 @ sK5)) | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f74])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f74,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (sK0 != (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (~ (sK1 @ Y0))))) | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f72])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f127,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  spl2_4 | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f116,f72,f123])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f116,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ($true = (sK0 @ sK5)) | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f115])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f115,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ($true = (sK0 @ sK5)) | ($true = (sK0 @ sK5)) | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f109])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f109,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ($true = (sK0 @ sK5)) | ($true = ((sK0 @ sK5) & (~ (sK1 @ sK5)))) | spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f108])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f103,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  spl2_1 | ~spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f102])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f102,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  $false | (spl2_1 | ~spl2_2)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f101])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f101,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ($true = $false) | (spl2_1 | ~spl2_2)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f80,f100])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f100,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((sK0 @ sK4) = $false) | (spl2_1 | ~spl2_2)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f91])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f91,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ($true = $false) | ((sK0 @ sK4) = $false) | (spl2_1 | ~spl2_2)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(superposition,[],[f87,f79])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f79,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ($true = (sK1 @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.21/0.39	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f78])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f78,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (((sK0 @ sK4) & (sK1 @ sK4)) != $false) | spl2_1),
0.21/0.39	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f77])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f77,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (((^[Y0 : $i]: ($false)) @ sK4) != ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.21/0.39	  inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f70])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f70,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) != (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false))) | spl2_1),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f68])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f87,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((sK1 @ X1) = $false) | ((sK0 @ X1) = $false)) ) | ~spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f85])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f85,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X1) = $false) | ($true = (~ (sK1 @ X1)))) ) | ~spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f84])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f84,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true = ((sK0 @ X1) & (~ (sK1 @ X1)))) | ((sK0 @ X1) = $false)) ) | ~spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f82])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f82,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X1) = ((sK0 @ X1) & (~ (sK1 @ X1))))) ) | ~spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f81])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f81,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((sK0 @ X1) = ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (~ (sK1 @ Y0)))) @ X1))) ) | ~spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(argument_congruence,[],[f73])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f73,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (sK0 = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (~ (sK1 @ Y0))))) | ~spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f72])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f80,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ($true = (sK0 @ sK4)) | spl2_1),
0.21/0.39	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f78])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f76,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  spl2_2 | spl2_1),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f65,f68,f72])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f65,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (sK0 = (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (~ (sK1 @ Y0))))) | ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) = (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false)))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f64])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f64,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (sK0 = ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (~ (Y1 @ Y2)))))))) @ sK0 @ sK1)) | (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (Y1 @ Y2))))))) @ sK0 @ sK1) = (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false)))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f48,f58,f52,f57])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f57,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (setminus = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (~ (Y1 @ Y2)))))))))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f21,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (setminus = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (~ (Y1 @ Y2)))))))))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f20])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f20,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : (~(X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2))) = setminus)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(rectify,[],[f9])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f9,axiom,(
0.21/0.39	  ((^[X0 : $i > $o, X2 : $i > $o, X3 : $i] : (~(X2 @ X3) & (X0 @ X3))) = setminus)),
0.21/0.39	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJsXAFSek9/Vampire---4.8_11278',setminus)).
0.21/0.39	thf(f52,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (intersection = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (Y1 @ Y2))))))))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f35,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (intersection = (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (Y1 @ Y2))))))))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f34])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f34,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((^[X0 : $i > $o, X1 : $i > $o, X2 : $i] : ((X1 @ X2) & (X0 @ X2))) = intersection)),
0.21/0.39	  inference(rectify,[],[f8])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f8,axiom,(
0.21/0.39	  ((^[X0 : $i > $o, X2 : $i > $o, X3 : $i] : ((X2 @ X3) & (X0 @ X3))) = intersection)),
0.21/0.39	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJsXAFSek9/Vampire---4.8_11278',intersection)).
0.21/0.39	thf(f58,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (emptyset = (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false)))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f31,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (emptyset = (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false)))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f3,axiom,(
0.21/0.39	  (emptyset = (^[X0 : $i] : ($false)))),
0.21/0.39	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJsXAFSek9/Vampire---4.8_11278',emptyset)).
0.21/0.39	thf(f48,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (emptyset = (intersection @ sK0 @ sK1)) | (sK0 = (setminus @ sK0 @ sK1))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f47,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((emptyset != (intersection @ sK0 @ sK1)) | (sK0 != (setminus @ sK0 @ sK1))) & ((emptyset = (intersection @ sK0 @ sK1)) | (sK0 = (setminus @ sK0 @ sK1)))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f45,f46])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f46,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((emptyset != (intersection @ X0 @ X1)) | ((setminus @ X0 @ X1) != X0)) & ((emptyset = (intersection @ X0 @ X1)) | ((setminus @ X0 @ X1) = X0))) => (((emptyset != (intersection @ sK0 @ sK1)) | (sK0 != (setminus @ sK0 @ sK1))) & ((emptyset = (intersection @ sK0 @ sK1)) | (sK0 = (setminus @ sK0 @ sK1))))),
0.21/0.39	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f45,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((emptyset != (intersection @ X0 @ X1)) | ((setminus @ X0 @ X1) != X0)) & ((emptyset = (intersection @ X0 @ X1)) | ((setminus @ X0 @ X1) = X0)))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f44])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f44,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ? [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((setminus @ X0 @ X1) = X0) <~> (emptyset = (intersection @ X0 @ X1)))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f43])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f43,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ~! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i > $o] : (((setminus @ X0 @ X1) = X0) <=> (emptyset = (intersection @ X0 @ X1)))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(rectify,[],[f16])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f16,negated_conjecture,(
0.21/0.39	  ~! [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : ((emptyset = (intersection @ X4 @ X5)) <=> ((setminus @ X4 @ X5) = X4))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f15])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f15,conjecture,(
0.21/0.39	  ! [X4 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : ((emptyset = (intersection @ X4 @ X5)) <=> ((setminus @ X4 @ X5) = X4))),
0.21/0.39	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NJsXAFSek9/Vampire---4.8_11278',thm)).
0.21/0.39	thf(f75,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ~spl2_1 | ~spl2_2),
0.21/0.39	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f66,f72,f68])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f66,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  ((^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (sK1 @ Y0))) != (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false))) | (sK0 != (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 @ Y0) & (~ (sK1 @ Y0)))))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f63])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f63,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (Y1 @ Y2))))))) @ sK0 @ sK1) != (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false))) | (sK0 != ((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: ((Y0 @ Y2) & (~ (Y1 @ Y2)))))))) @ sK0 @ sK1))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f49,f58,f52,f57])).
0.21/0.39	thf(f49,plain,(
0.21/0.39	  (emptyset != (intersection @ sK0 @ sK1)) | (sK0 != (setminus @ sK0 @ sK1))),
0.21/0.39	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47])).
0.21/0.39	% SZS output end Proof for Vampire---4
0.21/0.39	% (11499)------------------------------
0.21/0.39	% (11499)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.21/0.39	% (11499)Termination reason: Refutation
0.21/0.39	
0.21/0.39	% (11499)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.21/0.39	% (11499)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
0.21/0.39	% (11499)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
0.21/0.39	% (11499)------------------------------
0.21/0.39	% (11499)------------------------------
0.21/0.39	% (11492)Success in time 0.022 s
0.21/0.39	% Vampire---4.8 exiting
0.21/0.39	EOF